I was born in 1956. The entire world
only had a population of 2.8 billion. I had a wonderful childhood and
lots of friends. It increased in 1961 to 3 billion, but it didn't
bother me. I could work, both before I left school and when I left
school. By that stage it had increased to more than 3.7 billion. By
the time I got married it had increased to 4.5 billion, and by the
time my marriage ended in 1991 it had gone up to 5.3 billion. Did I
pay any attention? Nope.
My second husband and I moved to
Australia in 2005, and the world population had increased to more
than 6.5 billion. Within my 10 years here it had increased to 7.4
billion. Did I pay any attention? Yes, I did now.
Back in 1804 the global world
population hit the first billion people. Maybe that would have been a
great celebration! It didn't even increase to 2 billion until 1927,
123 years later... perhaps another celebration instead of the war
that had finished very recently. The third billion, which I mentioned
in my first paragraph, was 1961: 34 years. Recently it has run
through its next billion every 12 years. If you don't know how
quickly it increases, have a look at the UN Worldometers – that
goes around far too fast but it shows how many people just pop into
this world and are counted. (I personally think there's a whole heap
of people who aren't even counted...) By 2020 the global population
will be either just under or just over 8 billion.
To look at country populations, go to
the UN page called “Population by country”. The first three in
the world are China (1.382 billion), India (1.326 billion) and the
USA (324 million). Where is Aus? Well, this country is number 53.
We've only got 24 million – so why does Aus think they can take on
world global FTAs? I'll get to that soon.
Donald Trump won an election in the USA
in November this year. That has been protested against by many, many
people from US who understand how badly Trump
works/talks/appears/acts/cares. He's very little different from
Malcolm Turnbull, Australia's PM who worries more about his own money
than how people within the Australian workforce cope.
Very
recently, within the last 3.5 years since LNP won the 2013 election,
Australia has lost jobs, lost apprenticeships, buried too many
construction workers, bombed in the deficit budget, cut funds from
domestic violence, homelessness, medical issues and too many more.
They've cut off the manufacture of Holden, stuck their middle finger
up at the rest of the world against the climate change which so many
sensible people think
is essential, cut the tax paid by rich people so they can get richer,
approved too much taxpayer funding within the coal area (look at the
global smog caused by burning coal!) and walked away from the Reef
destruction. They condemn unions but don't prosecute builders,
they've increased politicians superannuation and 6-year service
lifetime flights, funded private schools but not public schools,
spent far, far too
much on refurbishing offices in Canberra.
And
this government just doesn't care about ordinary Australians.
Why
has this government signed FTAs? In September 2015 the ninth round of negotiations with India took place; whilst there's no report on the
final meeting, the trade with India has happened for a number of
years, so why is an FTA needed? We've already traded with them –
from $6.8 billion in FY2003-04 to $15.2 billion in 2013. What would
we do with an FTA?
ChFTA with China was signed on 20 December 2015. The FTA refers to trading
between Aus and China, yet any Aus company which only trades within
Australia isn't included. Unfortunately, the FTA doesn't actually
benefit the workforces
since the government has spoken about cutting wages – and some
people simply think of $2 a day (Gina Rinehart)! Maybe that won't
(shouldn't) happen, but in some of the countries where Aus has FTAs,
that sort of extremely low pay is already seen. More people being
pushed into poverty?? Too many billions on this planet.
The US-Aus FTA is, according to DFAT,
“a key pillar of the strong and multifaceted partnership between
Australia and the United States.” That agreement came into
being in 2015, again after the LNP was elected. This particular FTA
refers mostly to investment rather than trade - “The United
States is the most significant investor in Australia, accounting for
28.4 per cent (or $860.3 billion) of Australia’s total foreign
investment stock as of December 2015.” That's also on the DFAT
page. Why does this agreement get rid of tariff? Why do any
country in this globe even charge tariffs? Or taxes or customs?
The use of tax, tariff, duty, VAT, GST,
customs and whatever they're called elsewhere, seems to appear in
almost every country. Have a look through the Wikipaedia pages for
information, including a bit of history. There's too much for me to
include it in here, but there's one thing which frustrates me: the
use of a Border team – for instance, the Customs and Border Protection in the USA (started 1 March 2003, original Border Patrol
dated back to 1924), Border Services Agency in Canada (started 12
December 2003 to replace 3 Canadian “legacy agencies”), and, in
Australia, a very bad name – Border Force (started on 1 July 2015,
previously the Customs and Border
Protection Service started in 2009). It seems that wherever
they're set up, they do similar to what the Australia Border Force
does: seizure of goods, working out if the people weren't complying,
and civil and criminal penalties against involved parties.
These sort of teams seem to have really
started since the FTAs did. And do you agree with these “thug”
teams? How about you build a wall, as identified by Quebec University expert Elisabeth Valle and reported in the UK Daily Mail back on 22
August 2015. There's apparently 65 in the process of being build
now...
What do you think the population will
be in 2020? Do you think it'll hit 8 billion? Do you think that
governments which have set up FTAs, border teams and low pay will
keep doing it? What would happen to the job seekers which governments
call “dole bludgers”? What will happen to anything in any
government budget which supports rich people and ignores absolutely
needed people? Would anything in the politics of any country end up
in a world war? Do you believe in what this government does, or what
any government anywhere in the world will do? Why? Or why not?
What happens next??
No comments:
Post a Comment